DISTORTED PERSPECTIVE’S
“How many Gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable,
liberating
experience -- one that initiated them into their sexuality - f it
weren‘t for so called
molestation?”
A disturbing quote, from Carl Maves, in an Article; “Getting over it” in
the Homosexual Paper, The Advocate (San Francisco) May 5th, 1992.
Maves inadvertently confirms numerous surveys of homosexuality showing
that the FIRST sexual experience is often a determining factor in
subsequent “Orientation” particularly if the experience is initiated by
an older, trusted, authority figure.
COMING OUT
‘My first time was with my Maths teacher, when I was 13. She tutored me,
and after a couple of weeks it all happened. I wasn’t sure about it at
first. Not sure I liked it because I wasn’t out then as a dyke. We saw
each other for about 2 months and then she got fired.”
Quote from a Young Girl, now a resident of a Youth Refuge, in the
National Aids Bulletin, (Australia) Sept 93, on “Coming out”.
The philosophical bias of the Aids Bulletin is Pro-homosexual, and
rather than call for protection of children against sexual seduction by
homosexual adults, seems to support the call for protection of
homosexual adults “Right” to incorporate children into their patterns of
sexual gratification.
LEARNING YOUR “GAY, B, C”
Homosexual Activists groups are determined to recruit children to the
Gay life through “Positive &
Affirming” programs in Schools.
“The dominant and pervasive sexuality which is actively promoted in the
culture is one which is both heterosexual and sexist. Such an ideology
is oppressive and repressive, hence A US supports provisions for
homosexual and heterosexuals to raise the issue of homosexuality in
social institutions.”
This quote, from the Australian Union of Students Policy on
Homosexuality, claims that the normal culture (hetero-sexual) is
“Oppressive and Repressive” a view that few people other than homosexual
Activists would agree with. If homosexuality is something one is “Born
with” and “Cannot change” as Gay Activists are NOW saying - what’s the
point of presenting an “Alternative”?.
The fact is that Gay Activists have never believed that homosexuality is
inherited, it simply became
Politically expedient to adopt that line, in order to gain Public
sympathy and push the “Human
Rights” fraud. This is confirmed in Gay Activist Media strategy; ‘After
the Ball” published by Plume
books, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen in 1987. QUOTE;
“In any campaign to win over the public, Gays nuts! he portrayed as
victims in need of protection so that Straights will be inclined by
reflex to adopt the role of protector To this end, an effective Media
campaign would make use of symbols and spokespersons that reduce the
Straight majority’s sense of threat, and induce it to lower its guard”
“First, the public should be persuaded that Gays are victims of
circumstance, that for all practical purposes, Gays should he considered
to have been B01?N Gay”
“Second, Gays should be portrayed as victims of prejudice”
“The Waging Peace media campaign will reach Straights on an emotional
level (Not
factual/objective or logical.), casting Gays as victims and inviting
Straights to be their protectors”.
THE CAMPAIGN WAGES ON
The Australian Union of Students Education supplement; National U, March
7th, 1977;
“Since homosexuality is a positive, valid and healthy alternative
lifestyle choice, it is fair that proper sex education, with
homosexuality being presented as such, be given to schools.”
The book; “Young Gay and Proud” Published for students by the Gay &
Lesbian Teachers and Students Group of Melbourne, includes this advice
for young people;
“You have probably been told as you have grown lip that your anus is a
dirty place and shouldn’t be touched. This is stupid. People should be
happy with all parts of their bodies, and f they aren’t it means they
can’t like themselves “.
The majority of people on this planet, prefer to have as little as
possible to do with their anus - but still manage to like themselves for
all that. Why should your child be taught otherwise?
The book (for young children in Public Schools) goes on to state;
“If you find anal intercourse a little hard, it may be because it is not
your thing. Or it might be that you need to practice a bit/or the
pleasure to come through just like anything else that’s new.”
In 1977-78, the Lesbian Resource Centre of Melbourne issued 22 “Lesbian
Demands” the second of which reads;
“Gay Studies; We demand that Gay studies be introduced immediately into
all Educational Institutions as a measure of positive Discrimination -
to counter the heterosexist bias.”
In plain language, what they are saying is they want to discriminate
against Normal Family Values and the beliefs of the majority of the
population which is heterosexual, by teaching YOUR children - THEIR
values.
THE BEST OF GAY DOUBLESPEAK
In an Article; “Gays, some basic facts”, author Laurie Bebbington
states;
“Homosexual men & women are fighting to change the learning process
which is so laden with damaging moral values. It must he accepted that
the homosexual lifestyle is a valid, positive and healthy alternative.
In order to do this, it is necessary to stop confusing the possibilities
which are presented to children “.
What evidence do they put forward that Normal traditional Moral values
are “Damaging”, and when
most Medical evidence suggests the contrary -Homosexuality is
UN-natural, UN-healthy and clearly
AB-Normal - why MUST homosexuality be “accepted” at all?
Haven’t homosexuals heard of Freedom of opinion?
WHY - should it be regarded by a decent, Moral Community as an
“ALTERNATIVE” ie; as a CHOICE? (Born that way?- apparently not)
Note carefully, that by introducing a new, unorthodox “Alternative
choice” into the Schools, it is clearly homosexuals who are “Confusing”
the possibilities presented to children.
At its Annual Conference in January 1977, the Australian Union of
Students declared;
“Homosexual teachers have the right to express, and a necessary role
topl in presenting, alternative 4fe styles within the Education system
Funny, most Parents who send their children off to school think that
teachers are paid to give children an understanding of Scientific facts
- not to impose subversive, immoral, and unhealthy indoctrination which
conflicts with majority values, and Medical/Sociological research.
CONTEMPT FOR PARENTS & SOCIETY
The AUS asserts that as role models, homosexual teachers DEMAND not only
the right actively and openly to present the homosexual alternative to
students, but also the ‘right” to say what they please within the
schools and to oppose the views and values that are held by Society at
large.
Official AUS Policies on Lesbianism & Homosexuality include support for;
“The right of Lesbians and male homosexuals to question and oppose the
presumed values and standards held within the Education system “.
WHY TARGET CHILDREN?
The AUS provides this revealing statement;
“Children are born a-sexual. The possibility is there to relate to
either sex. Yet, we are channelled into limiting our human potential.
The Heterosexual norm negates the possibility of free sexuality.
Children are born with the potential to BECOME Bisexual, Homosexual.
Heterosexual, A-sexual”.
So much for the Gay slogan; “You can’t make a Gay kid straight”.
Obviously, what they think, and what they tell the Public are two
different things entirely.
These Gay publications make a mockery of their claim to Victimisation,
or that Sodomy is normal, natural & healthy. The greatest concern is
that they are STILL pushing their ideas in Your schools, and the
overwhelming weight of Medical evidence is that Homosexual behavior is
extremely Unhealthy and leads to all kinds of emotional/sexual problems.
FAMILIES - A STUMBLING BLOCK TO FREE PEDOPHILE ACCESS
THE FAMILY UNIT MUST BE ABOLISHED
In 1987, Gay Revolutionary” Michael Swift (Member of BLAZE, an
Australian Pedophile group) wrote in the mainline Homosexual newspaper;
“Gay Community News”;
“The Family unit, spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity,
hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The Family unit, which only
curbs imagination and free will - must be eliminated. Perfect boys will
be conceived in the genetic laboratory, they will be bonded together
under the control and instruction of homosexual savants”
Only one year before, the Federal Labour Government gave a grant of
$123,000 to Homosexual Groups to Publish “Gay Community News”, and
“Outrage” homosexual magazines.
In 1993, the Tasmanian Homosexual magazine, “Pink Thylacines” carried
three articles challenging the traditional Family. These are the words
of Gay Activist, teacher, and child minder, Anthony Powell;
“Child raising is a social responsibility, not one of the Parents alone,
f we expect children to be active (Gay Activism/sexually active?) in
society we must take upon ourselves the responsibility to challenge the
prevailing belief that sex should stay INSIDE the bedroom, and child
raising within the Family walls.”
(Brackets ours)
“Gay men and Lesbians offer a direct threat to the Patriarchial,
Heirarchial and sexist makeup of mainstream Society. To challenge first
the sexual norms of Society - then the issue of child raising is indeed
a threat.”
“It is time to openly counter and reject oppressive societal structures
and institutions, it is time for us to reject the oppressive power
structures which affect the upbringing of our children.”
“One of the most insidious of these is the FAMILY.”
You may recall, that homosexuals do not produce any children, they
haven’t managed to fool nature to that extent yet. What Powell is
talking about is THEIR upbringing of YOUR children.
CHILDREN’S LIBERATION - FROM SAFETY & RESPONSIBILITY
The book “Young, Gay & Proud” by the Melbourne Gay Teachers & Students
Group, produced as a guide for children, gives them information on
“Getting started” (sexually) and exhorts children to “Do what seems
right” to them (P3) and to “trust their Feelings” and the book assures
children that it is not only “Good” to be Gay, but that an integral part
of discovering/being oneself involves giving full play to Homosexual
desires.
The book also advises that;
“The sort of ideas that really screw people up include the idea that sex
is only for marriage”
Would that teaching have ANY bearing on the escalation of teenage
pregnancy and abortion, or on the fact that in Australia, since 1981,
sexually transmitted diseases have INCREASED by an average of 600% ?
(Dept of Health Annual Report 1992)
The Homosexual newspapers report current epidemics of Hepatitis A, B and
C and Gonorrhea among Homosexual men in Australia, The Australian HIV
Surveillance Unit reports that 89% of all known FIIV infections in
Australia are among Homosexual men. The National Aids Bulletin reports
that the greatest increase in HIV is in young homosexual men.
These are the people who DEMAND the right to teach YOUR children about
sex?
Homosexuals, with full Federal Labour Government support also teach YOUR
children that it is Morally WRONG to disagree with Homosexual Activists,
and those who do so are “Homophobic”
In other words they are determined to recruit and indoctrinate YOUR
children and to alienate them from their “Old Fashioned, Homophobic
Parents”.
TAKING A NAME FOR THEMSELVES
Homosexual Activists infiltrated several Community Organisations, to
have input into Social Policy making, to gain some credibility by using
the reputation and good name of well known and formerly respectable
Institutions. They also find it useful to use the Taxpayer funding those
organisations attract, to further the Gay Agenda.
So far Gay Activists have taken over TASCOSS, (The Tasmanian Council Of
Social Services), Amnesty International, The Australian Family Planning
Association, several Churches, Teachers and Friends Associations, The
Quakers Society, The Human Rights Commission, as well as being
established in the Education department, Public Service in general and
the Media.
Note the direction TASCOSS has taken in its social priorities 1993;
TASCOSS Recommends that the Government introduces Anti-discrimination
legislation which prohibits discrimination and harassment on the grounds
of sexual orientation - this legislation should not discriminate
against, Lesbian & Gay teachers and Youth Workers”.
“The Government ensures that factual, affirming, and easily accessible
information is available in all Schools and colleges, and in other
locations accessible to Young people.”
It may have come to your attention, that the Gay Agenda, strongly
supported by Labour, Greens and
Democrats ... actually DISCRIMINATES OPENLY against Normal Families,
Healthy Moral
Values and Social responsibility.
As one Homosexual man dying of AIDS put it;
“Some of us (Homosexuals,) are deeply embarrassed by the Gay Agenda,
which plans and end to ‘Breeders’ (Hetero-sexuals) through a takeover of
Public Education”
Mark Dennis, Wall Street Journal, 26th May 1993.
PEDOPHILES - WHO US?
Whenever a concerned Parent speaks out about the volume of Pedophile
promotion taking place in
Schools and Homosexual publications, the Gay movement retorts with
vindictive counter
accusations, that Heterosexuals commit MOST sexual abuse of children.
It is indeed true, that the number of Heterosexuals who sexually abuse
children seems to be higher, but there is no escaping that Pedophiles
are DIS-proportionately represented among the Homosexual population.
There is no escaping the fact that Homosexual Publications actively
promote Pedophilia and that Homosexual, NOT heterosexual groups are
enthusiastically campaigning to legalise and normalise the practice.
The Media strategy designed by Marshall Kirk in 1987, makes it plain
that Homosexuals, UNLIKE Heterosexuals WILLINGLY accept Pedophiles
within their ranks.
“It goes without saying that groups on the farthest fringe of
acceptance, such as NAMBLA, must play no part at all in the Public
Campaign. suspected child molesters will never look like victims.”
NAMBLA, stands for North American Man-Boy Love Association, a Pedophile
group which Marches in all Gay Pride parades, usually with a Naked
toddler on the shoulders of an adult male.
NAMBLA has been a member of the Gay Movement in America almost since its
inception, and was one of the founding members of the International Gay
& Lesbian Rights Group which gained “Consultant” status to the United
Nations in 1993.
Since the American envoy exposed the link with NAMBLA, the Gay & Lesbian
movement has become extremely coy, feigning shock - horror at
“Discovering” a Pedophile Organisation in its midst.
GAYS CANCEL PEDOPHILL4 WORKSHOP
So runs the headline of the West Australian of the weekend 1-2/9/84
“The Annual Conference of the Gay & Lesbian movement being held at the
University of Queensland, yesterday decide to remove voluntarily a
planned workshop on Pedophilia from today’s agenda”- the paper said.
This follows public outrage including some University staff and the
Queensland Government at the very concept of promoting child sexual
exploitation.
But this is not the first time Gay & Lesbian Groups openly discussed
promotion of Pedophilia here in
Australia. Virtually all Annual Conferences have raised and discussed
the subject since the 7th
Annual Conference in Adelaide August 29/30, 1981.
A workshop on Pedophilia at the 8th National Conference of Gays &
Lesbians (Canberra, Sept 1982) illustrates the influence Pedophiles have
within the Gay movement;
“The workshop was introduced by a male (homosexual) pedophile who
discussed his relationship with boys and with their families/households
in a challenging and open way.”
The level of understanding of the issues this year was much higher than
previously. It may be this is the result of the cumulative effect of
these discussions at previous conferences.
By and large the workshop was able to turn its attention to the question
of how to go about undermining the oppression of Pedophiles.
As you can see, homosexuals and Lesbians are by NO MEANS strangers to
the idea of legalised Pedophile relationships - it HAS been raised at
several consecutive Conferences, and, as we said, it is a common subject
in homosexual publications.
Of 30 issues of “Gay Community News” between February 1980 and January
1983, over half (16) have carried one or more news articles on
Pedophilia, and 10 out of 15 issues of “Outrage” between April 1983 and
July 1994 carried articles relating to Pedophilia.
In May 1994, Homosexual magazine “Outrage” declared its editorial
position on Pedophilia as;
“The defence of the Civil Liberties of Pedophiles and alleged
Pedophiles, and of the right of Pedophiles to make their case in the Gay
Media”
How do you go about beating Anti-Pedophile attitudes? a Pedophile
Activists was asked in “Gay Community News”. He replied;
“I’ve felt that what we should do is on a fairly quiet level build
alliances with Radical Groups and Feminist Groups, but also people
working in Youth Work”.
When the Delta Task Force of the Victorian Police Department arrested 9
men who were allegedly members of the Australian Pedophile Support Group
in November 1983, Homosexual Activists, (not
Heterosexuals) called emergency meetings in Sydney & Melbourne.
Homosexuals at the meetings condemned the Police action (Defending
children from sexual exploitation) claimed that it was a “Threat to all
y people” and declared their support for the “Civil Liberties” of
Pedophiles. (Not children and their parents).
Writing in “Gay Information” (Not the Mainstream Heterosexual press) on
the arrests, Gillian Leahy, who describes herself as a Hetero-sexual
Feminist, noted that the effect of the arrests of members of Pedophile
groups would make it hard for them to continue to form a Pedophile
consciousness, informed by Feminist and Gay consciousness, by forcing
them well and truly back into the closet.
Perhaps, when Gays came roaring out of those closets in the late 1970’s,
they should have shut the door behind them, now, every form of sexual
permissiveness is following behind them - fully supported by Homosexual
groups.
In March last year, homosexual Activists called for Amnesty
International to protect the Civil Liberties of Sado-Masochist Fetish
people. Where will it all end?
Leahy, a Feminist says;
“It is important that Feminists and Gay Liberationists and the Left -
support these (Pedophile, groups and do not push them away as extremist
weirdos. If we do, it makes it hard for them to develop a Radical
Pedophile philosophy.
In a press release issued in defence of the men arrested by the Delta
Task Force, the Australian Pedophile Support Group said;
“As with women and other oppressed people, consciousness raising groups
have been important for Pedophiles. Their (Radical Feminist,) support
has been instrumental in establishing a GAY identity for Pedophiles. If
this group is found guilty of conspiring to corrupt Public Morals, it
will mean that all Gay groups discussing their Homosexuality can be
similarly charged.”
That is one reason for retaining Crimes Against Morality in the Criminal
Code, and the reason why,
Homosexual groups are so paranoid about removing such Laws from the
Statute books. When
Homosexual acts are NO LONGER a Moral Crime, there can be NO CHARGE of
“Corrupting
Morals” this of course leaves them as free as heterosexuals to promote
Homosexual behaviour
anywhere, anytime, that includes Schools, and, as we can see, that
includes Pedophilia.
One of the consequences of this “Liberation” of sexual abandon is
demonstrated from an article in “Outrage” magazine in defence of
Pedophilia;
“In Sydney of/ate, a number of (largely Feminist) Social Workers have
been
mumbling in Radical Welfare circles about a series of incidents where
male Youth Workers and males who Foster Young men, are getting off
(having sex) with their young male clients. That puts these worried
Social Workers in a quandary; they want to defend Gays from
discriminatory policies and they are
sincere supporters of Gay rights, but they also think that the kids are
being
sexually exploited in some cases.”
“1 am not talking here of Social Workers who automatically assume that
such acts are the result of force, or for whom the thought of ‘Inter
Generational” sex is filled with horror. I am talking about people who
are usually prepared to subject their ideas and principles to scrutiny,
to challenge the ideological basis of their gut reactions. It is this
willingness which makes the issue Politically urgent for Gays.”
What he is saying, is that Social workers are usually trained to he NON-Judgernental,
and that when their gut reaction questions Gay Foster Carers having sex
with minors or youths in their care, they have failed to be non-judgernental
about it, and need to sort THEMSELVES out.
Addressing Feminists and Lesbians, Betty Kounslow opens an apology on
Pedophilia, by acknowledging the abundance of “Ifs and ‘Buts’ on the
issues, she declares,
‘Most of us can’t answer those ‘Buts’ vet — because we haven ‘t thought
and talked and read enough, or because our politics have not yet
developed enough to be able to embrace the complexities of the issues of
Paedophilia. But we will — if we persist.”
In other words, true to form, radical feminists will find a way to
justify any perversion, just like they rationaljsed Lesbianism,
Homosexuality - they will come to rationalise Pedophilia, as just
another ‘norma and healthy Alternative’ if they persist.
Meanwhile, while Gays. Lesbians and Radical Feminists Rhapsodise over
the profound mysteries of the continuum of human sexual diversity
Thousands of young children are having their lives placed at risk, their
health jeopardised and their Psycho/emotional reality devastated.
Other people’s children are NOT the playthings of the sexually depraved.
However, the situation will not only continue, it will become
progressively worse, with more and more young lives devastated - unless,
the Community at large gets over Gay slogans and Political Correctness,
and begins to stand up in defence of sensible Moral values, and in
defence of the lives of young children.
THIS IS ONLY A BARE OUTLINE OF THE DOCUMENTATION
ON PEDOPH1LIA AND THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT
WE BELIEVE TUE ISSUE IS VERY SERIOUS INDEED
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
WILL YOU HELP PROTECT AUSTRALIA’S INNOCENT CHILDREN?
We Gratefully acknowledge the research work of Andrew Landsdowne of
Western Australia for most of the quotes in this report, and strongly
recommend his hook. “Blatant & Proud” a history of the Gay Agenda in
Australia available from T.4S-AI.ERT.
We also acknowledge the work of Stephen Green of London, and strongly
urge you to get a copy of his book “Sexual Dead End” Broadview Books,
London 1902. .\ history in great detail of the Gay and Pedophile
movements of Britain
We hope, that you will care enough, and that you are aware enough to
recognise that what the homosexual movement and their supporters say in
Public, and what they ACTUALLY believe, DO, and Write in their own
circles - is NOT THE SAME
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. CONTACT,
AUSTRALIAN SPIRIT
|
